Belated answer, but yes, in a way: https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.26#errorspkgerrors
On Saturday, December 26, 2020 at 11:36:31 AM UTC+1 wilk wrote: > On 26-12-2020, Christian Staffa wrote: > > I would rather have a survey with generics specific question that would > she= > > d a better light to this topic. at least now, after following this > discussi= > > on. i also think that it could be good to add it but is it worth when it > al= > > so adds complexity? then i would say no thank you. go is powerful and > simpl= > > e but after that it would be powerful and complex. i think it would be > bett= > > er for go to solve the error handling. this would also make the go code > bet= > > ter readable which would help the language more than adding generics if > it = > > is a good solution, i think =F0=9F=92=AD=20 > > Maybe adding generics will help handling error ? > > -- > wilk > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ffeb4c8e-9c9b-4948-80fc-cabf975ed108n%40googlegroups.com.
