Thanks, I'll check it out.

Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> 于2026年6月25日周四 09:51写道:

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 6:17 PM [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > WHAT I'D LIKE FEEDBACK ON
> >
> > 1. Defined type over iter.Seq vs a struct wrapper — does the zero-cost
> interop
> >    justify pinning T to `any` and pushing constrained ops to free
> functions?
> > 2. The method-vs-free-function rule above: would you have drawn it
> elsewhere?
> > 3. Any cleaner idea than the subtype trick for restoring the chain on
> >    constrained operations?
>
> I think that is what you are after is what Merovious outlined at
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/65394#issuecomment-1933627587.
>
> Ian
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADucCam_jwJwdp0bj6XRmR40eLN6D1otnDgM7PgKYG2YDEqGyQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to