Two counterpoints:

1. Ian answered this last week: if there is something to say, say it here 
rather than leading a thread with a link to an blog post. That norm shouldn't 
change based on if an individual subscriber get value out of a given post. 
Anyone who wants every article can subscribe to get posts emailed from Medium.

2. Writing a decent post used to take hours or days which kept the volume 
self-limiting. It now takes ~30 minutes.  I considered sending my blog posts to 
the list a while back but thought it would be bad netiquette. If weekly 
link-drops are fine, will it still be fine if a lot more of us do the same?

-Mike

P.S. My personal objection is to AI-written content, not occasional 
human-authored posts.

P.P.S. I put my objection on the record now, so I don't plan to comment again 
on this topic.


> On Jul 26, 2026, at 9:08 PM, Jason E. Aten <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Nah. To me, these are fine. They are both topical to Go and discuss novel 
> aspects of Go programming, and are written fairly infrequently. I for one 
> appreciate them and have learned about important topics like eBPF from them. 
> They seems like appropriate use of go-nuts to me.
> 
> I could wish the articles didn't use AI without fact checking... but meh, 
> humans make plenty of mistakes too.
> 
> On Sunday, July 26, 2026 at 6:42:25 AM UTC-3 Duncan Harris wrote:
> I think you probably need to stop posting these articles to this group. It is 
> not scalable. People will get annoyed.
> 
> On Friday, 24 July 2026 at 23:02:37 UTC+1 Cheikh Seck wrote:
> Go 1.26's runtime/secret (GOEXPERIMENT=runtimesecret) tags allocations inside 
> secret.Do(f) for erasure — the right layer to stop secrets leaking into crash 
> core dumps. Key takeaway: it marks, doesn't wipe — you must call runtime.GC() 
> right after or you still leak, and it's a no-op off linux/amd64+arm64.
> 
> I built a reproducible harness (canary → SIGSEGV → scan the core): control 
> leaks, secret doesn't. Repo + Dockerfile: 
> https://github.com/cheikh2shift/go-snippets/tree/main/secret-demo
> 
> Writeup: 
> https://towardsdev.com/runtime-secret-go-1-26s-answer-to-secrets-leaking-in-core-dumps-d884615e971f
> 
> 
> --

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/F2D6B184-B8A6-4420-A9CB-56733E20904F%40newclarity.net.

Reply via email to