https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192742
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Vincent Batts from comment #4) > so, the following should not reference 'ipp' ?: A different case: <2><40>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_variable) <41> DW_AT_name : &ipp <46> DW_AT_location : 4 byte block: 9c 11 60 22 (DW_OP_call_frame_cfa; DW_OP_consts: -32; DW_OP_plus) <4b> DW_AT_type : <0xe45a> <1><e45a>: Abbrev Number: 17 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) <e45b> DW_AT_name : ***int <e462> DW_AT_type : <0xe46b> <e46a> Unknown AT value: 2900: 22 <1><e46b>: Abbrev Number: 17 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) <e46c> DW_AT_name : **int <e472> DW_AT_type : <0xe47b> <e47a> Unknown AT value: 2900: 22 [...] Only this line should be omitted: <e45b> DW_AT_name : ***int Because there is no triple-pointer in the .go source, it is only internal implementation detail how golang has compiled it. With my patch this DIE <1><e45a>: Abbrev Number: 17 (DW_TAG_pointer_type) <e45b> DW_AT_name : ***int <e462> DW_AT_type : <0xe46b> <e46a> Unknown AT value: 2900: 22 is replaced by this DIE: <1><fe77>: Abbrev Number: 18 (DW_TAG_reference_type) <fe78> DW_AT_name : &(***int) <fe82> DW_AT_type : <0xe462> <fe8a> Unknown AT value: 2900: 22 But still this line should be in fact omitted for DWARF compliance: <fe78> DW_AT_name : &(***int) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ golang mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/golang
