----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>
> To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 4:45:31 PM
> Subject: Re: vendored dep licenses to include (or skip) in binary rpms
> 
> Le lundi 05 mars 2018 à 10:07 -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar a écrit :
> > When you ship a Go binary like cri-o, do you need to include the
> > licenses of all vendored dependencies at %license? Or does it suffice
> > to specify just the license file of the main package itself?
> 
.
.
.
> 3. it is *way* simpler with dynamic linking where all the objects are
> nicely separated, in different packages, with separate documentation,
> and legal analysis can be made at the time you assemble the packages,
> not at the time you ship them. Volunteers willing to convert Fedora
> packages to dynamic linking are welcome.
> 

Nicolas, 

I would much appreciate if you could help me to convert Fedora to dynamic 
linking in regard to the the Go packaging. May I count you in?

JC

> 4. if you publish a Go project: don't vendor, use stable releases of
> other components, and if you do vendor don't include the vendored files
> in you git repo, just the vendor config file.
> 
> But do ask spot or fedoral-legal when in doubt.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot
> _______________________________________________
> golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
_______________________________________________
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to