------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/vzIolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
DON'T WHISPER A WORD OF THIS TO ANYONE! ;^) Source: <http://www.infiltrated.net/orkut.php> Author: sil [at] infiltrated [dot] net If for some reason you cannot access some of the URL's mentioned on this text, use a proxy: <http://www.the-cloak.com/login.html> Who is friends with Orkut? <http://www.datawhorehouse.com/orkut/mapme.php?id=orkut+BUYUKKOKTEN> Let's have a look. By the way if you see your name in there, click on it why not! Fun for the whole planet! Is Orkut part of some spook program? Who knows but I won't be using it any longer. Besides, being guilty by associating with terrorist, and or their networks is definitely not my forte. I don't mind being watched by government agencies like the CIA, FBI, NSA, really I don't, because it's inevitable to some extent. I shouldn't have to PGP sign a message to my wife if I want to have e-sex with her, I shouldn't have to PGP sign my messages to friends when I express my gripes about the government, I do so all the time on Politrix <http://www.politrix.org>. What I do mind, is being part of some kooky experiment. I wondered why after changing my name to a nick was I 'jailed' and told to place it back so often. I emailed the contacts at Orkut to no avail. Seems like they're bent on having one's information. Sort of silly considering I could have used a proxy to register account after account and become lost in a myriad of Onion routing proxies. Again, I just don't like the fact someone somewhere is doing something rather odd. You make what you want out of it. There are a lot of cool people I've happened to meet, and I've run into some people I haven't spoken to in a while, but unfortunately until I see some form of "This is what Orkut is..." coming out, I won't use it. I don't care to partake in any form of study without my consent. What is the study going to be used for, who is using it. The problem I can foresee is, supposing some agency wanted to start targeting a political campaign towards me, or flooding the airwaves with what they might think I want to hear. I didn't ask for that, it's deceitful, and I should have the right to know what it is - if it is some form of study - that I'm participating in. I should have the right to decide if I want to be in it, and sure "if you don't like it then you don't have to use it asshole" then I won't. For those who think "hey this is just coincidental", or "you're crazy they would never do that", I suggest you read what the government has done in those clinical trials of "We'll pay you to try this pharmaceutical product for reasearch. It's to cure stomach ailments." only to find out 20 years later the government was giving students hallucinogenics. Think it's crazy? Look it up on HREX <http://hrex.dis.anl.gov/> { "This site is no longer available due to lack of funding." -- they say. Try this: <http://tis.eh.doe.gov/ohre/>} aka Human Radiation Experiments, released via FOIA. Hey, that's directly from a government website, don't take my word for it go see for yourself. Then go on to read about how America's homeless are about to be branded like animals <http://politechbot.com/pipermail/politech/2004-April/000573.html>, and maybe you'll have a change of heart about your privacy, freedom and rights. Again, this has nothing to do with some 'conspiracy the government is going to lock me up' its simply a matter of questioning the exact purpose of Orkut'sdata mining. Doesn't the government (if they're behind Orkut.com) have enough using companies like Choicepoint <http://www.choicepoint.com> which boasts of having 12 billion records of Americans, everything down from where you lived for the past who knows how long, to what size underwear your wearing? I already ready know that Mr. John Asscroft has a problem with privacy <http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=225624&category=OPINION&newsdate=3/5/2004>, so I'm sure he doesn't mind having his entire life <http://cryptome.org/four-eyeballs.htm> - phone number, address and satellite images of his house for the world to see. Heck neither should Karl Rove, George Tenet nor Valerie Plame. <http://cryptome.org/four-eyeballs.htm> As for me, I would like the CHOICE of opting to do something, not unwillingly participate in something which can possibly harm me. As for Orkut, I suggest you ask Mr.BUYUKKOKTEN of Google about it, and why the heck it coincidentally is coming up alongside know CIA fronts and proxy companies, being he's written about social networks so much, maybe he can give you a better answer. Heck, I'd gladly welcome an 'explanation' of what Orkut is, and why he decided to host it oh so far away, and how it just oh so happens to run along the lines of the CIA, and NSA like fronts. As for me, it just spooks me out so I choose not to use it any longer, bottom line. Besides Cogent Communications has been linked to terrorists in the past, and I for one know I don't want to be associated with them. According to the Orkut website, this is what Orkut is: "orkut.com is an online community website designed for friends. The main goal of our service is to make your social life, and that of your friends, more active and stimulating. orkut's social network can help you both maintain existing relationships as well as establish new ones by reaching out to people you've never met before. Who you interact with is entirely up to you. Before getting to know an orkut member, you can even see how they're connecting to you through the friends network." Now I wonder, aside from being invited, can anyone state who invited them and trace it back to the first user. Obviously it had to be the first persons on the service since it's an invite only service. This would mean Orkut himself invited you somewhere along the line. "orkut is unique, because it's an organically growing network of trusted friends. That way we won't grow too large, too quickly and everyone will have at least one person to vouch for them. If you know someone who is a member of orkut, that person can invite you to join as well. If you don't know an orkut member, wait a bit and most likely you soon will." Seems really fishy. "That way we won't grow too large, too quickly and everyone will have at least one person to vouch for them." Who's vouching for Mr. Orkut I certainly don't know him, so why should I trust him, ever hear of the term guilty by association? To be fair about it, I decided to check out Cogent Communication's services for myself. Basic plan: * Rack Pack 2 - 2 Mbps + Full Rack for $1,000 * Rack Pack 100 - 100 Mbps + Full Rack for $3,000 So Orkut is just gracious enough to spend 12,000 a year for basic hosting? 12k is the lowball figure, after checking his Alexa stats <http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=orkut.com>, I'm guessing it's more like 3-4k maybe even more for Orkut, without one banner, one "click to support us", or anything else to make revenue. Pretty nice guy. He sure is a nice guy, and he has some pretty high powered lawyers too <http://www.infiltrated.net/orkut.pdf>, which makes this a bit stranger being Google has their own in house lawyers <http://www.infiltrated.net/google.pdf>. So now I hear the trolls: "But he's partnered with Google! I can add a search engine feature to my sites and call it partnering with Google, it means nothing. So who is paying for this? If it is Google, why not have it in their co-location facilities, I'm sure they'd be able to handle the traffic. Why not give their employee and his pet project access to their in house lawyers? Sadly I could find no mention of anyone paying for this, not Google, not Mr. Orkut, no one and believe me I'm resourceful at digging up information. I did find the following quote which offered a glimpse at, nothing fruitful: "Still, Google owns the technology developed by its employees, Rodriguez said" from the CNET article "Google spawns social networking service <http://news.com.com/2100-1026-5146006.html?tag=cd_top>", which then states: "Google spokeswoman Eileen Rodriguez said that despite Orkut's affiliation, the service is not part of Google's product portfolio at this time. "We're always looking at opportunities to expand our search products, but we currently have no plans in the social networking market." There is mention of the 'Friendster' purchase, but no mention of any money being given for Orkut. Someone is paying for this, I doubt Cogent Communications would offer the service out of their kind generosity. Whoever is doing it, is definitely dishing out some money. Google is the type to do so, but why if they have not divulge some bit of information on this, answer some simple questions. I know if I had money invested in some machines with the type of information I could mine from a service like Orkut, I would keep my machines near me, physically. If they went down, I'd want to be able to take a look, not fly to the other side of the country to see what's wrong. Registrant: BUYUKKOKTEN, ORKUT (UHGFNCTSOD) 2400 W El Camino Real, Apt 419 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-1680 US Domain Name: ORKUT.COM Administrative Contact: BUYUKKOKTEN, ORKUT (OBD36) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2400 W El Camino Real, Apt 419 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-1680 US 650 888 5822 fax: 123 123 1234 Technical Contact: Network Solutions, LLC. (HOST-ORG) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13200 Woodland Park Drive Herndon, VA 20171-3025 US 1-888-642-9675 fax: 571-434-4620 Record expires on 08-Dec-2006. Record created on 08-Dec-2002. Database last updated on 28-Mar-2004 14:09:43 EST. Domain servers in listed order: NS11.WORLDNIC.COM 216.168.225.141 NS12.WORLDNIC.COM 216.168.225.142 Who is ORKUT BUYUKKOKTEN? -- A computer science doctoral candidate at Stanford University and user interface design engineer for Google. --- A social network caught in the Web Lada A. Adamic and Eytan Adar HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA Orkut Buyukkokten Google, Mountain View, CA Abstract We present an analysis of Club Nexus, an online community at Stanford University. Through the Nexus site we were able to study a reflection of the real world community structure within the student body. We observed and measured social network phenomena such as the small world effect, clustering, and the strength of weak ties. Using the rich profile data provided by the users we were able to deduce the attributes contributing to the formation of friendships, and to determine how the similarity of users decays as the distance between them in the network increases. In addition, we found correlations between a user's personality and their other attributes, as well as interesting correspondences between how users perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others. <http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue8_6/adamic/> --- He seems to be quoted in "Organizing Literature Information for Clinical Decision Support" In the article "Patents: Idea for Online Networking Brings Two Entrepreneurs Together" Ironically Orkut is mentioned along with Tribe, Friendster, and In-Q-Tel. In-Q-Tel is already know to be a CIA capital venture firm. Sort of irrelevant to a point. So where does Orkut reside if Mr. Buyukkokten is in California, I'm sure he would like to have some form of control over a machine when it goes down or needs some hardware changes or updates. So let's have a peek shall we? # nslookup orkut.com Non-authoritative answer: Name: orkut.com Address: 66.28.250.19 There you are... # nslookup google.com Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Addresses: 216.239.39.99, 216.239.57.99, 216.239.37.99 Google is on their own network. Strange, you would figure Mr. Orkut would keep his machines close. After all he is an engineer at Google, and I'm sure being partnered with Google would provide him with an abundance of bandwith. However where do Orkut's servers reside? Registrant: Google Inc. (DOM-258879) 2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 US Domain Name: google.com Registrar Name: Alldomains.com Registrar Whois: whois.alldomains.com Registrar Homepage: http://www.alldomains.com Administrative Contact: DNS Admin (NIC-1340142) Google Inc. 2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 US [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.6503300100 Fax- +1.6506181499 Technical Contact, Zone Contact: DNS Admin (NIC-1340144) Google Inc. 2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 US [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.6503300100 Fax- +1.6506181499 Created on..............: 1997-Sep-15. Expires on..............: 2011-Sep-14. Record last updated on..: 2003-Apr-07 10:42:46. Domain servers in listed order: NS3.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.36.10 NS4.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.38.10 NS1.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.32.10 NS2.GOOGLE.COM 216.239.34.10 # whois -h whois.arin.net 66.28.250.19 OrgName: Cogent Communications OrgID: COGC Address: 1015 31st Street, NW City: Washington StateProv: DC PostalCode: 20007 Country: US ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.cogentco.com:4321/ NetRange: 66.28.0.0 - 66.28.255.255 CIDR: 66.28.0.0/16 NetName: COGENT-NB-0000 NetHandle: NET-66-28-0-0-1 Parent: NET-66-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: AUTH1.DNS.COGENTCO.COM NameServer: AUTH2.DNS.COGENTCO.COM Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE Comment: Reassignment information for this block can be found at Comment: rwhois.cogentco.com 4321 RegDate: 2000-10-12 Updated: 2001-12-05 TechHandle: ZC108-ARIN TechName: Cogent Communications TechPhone: +1-877-875-4311 TechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OrgAbuseHandle: COGEN-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Cogent Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-877-875-4311 OrgAbuseEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OrgNOCHandle: ZC108-ARIN OrgNOCName: Cogent Communications OrgNOCPhone: +1-877-875-4311 OrgNOCEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OrgTechHandle: IPALL-ARIN OrgTechName: IP Allocation OrgTechPhone: +1-877-875-4311 OrgTechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2004-03-27 19:15 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database. Good old Cogentco. What are the odds? # nslookup metacarta.com Non-authoritative answer: Name: metacarta.com Address: 66.28.23.141 Spooks turn to hi-tech geography Imagine being able to pinpoint someone's location anywhere in the world simply by typing a few keywords on your PC. Software allows spooks to pinpoint specific locations. That is what software partly funded by the US military is trying to do. The MetaCarta program works by analysing thousands of documents and cross-checking the results with a massive geographical database. So far it has largely been used by US intelligence agencies to analyse the huge amount of information collected as part of the war on terror." (BBC News <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3430987.stm>) MetaCarta, a company based in Boston, uses a text search algorithm that retrieves content based on geographic keywords. Its flagship product, the Geographic Text Search (GTS), has the ability to confine searches by geography and retrieve information that it detects using the keywords, and then displays this information geographically on a map interface. In January 2004, MetaCarta picked up $6.5 Million in second round funding from Sevin Rosen Funds, one of the premier venture capital firms for the IT industry. The company was founded about three years ago and started with the support of a few government agencies, such as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and from In-Q-Tel, a private fund established by the Central Intelligence Agency. The original mission of the company was to create a link between content management systems (CMS) and GIS. "What's really interesting is that when you look at the IT landscape is how much of it doesn't talk to each other because when people think about text documents they don't think of maps, but the stuff they are talking about in the text can be interpreted, by a human, as being geographic," says John Frank, founder of MetaCarta. "So we wanted to fix this disconnection point by building technology that would interpret text, parsed through a textual document, automatically define references that the software could translate into actual latitude and longitude coordinates. The company calls this "geoparsing." Source: <http://www.in-sourced.com/article/articleview/1493/1/1/> MetaCarta, Inc. -- MetaCarta's groundbreaking technology bridges the gap between Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and document retrieval. MetaCarta's flagship product, MetaCarta Geographic Text Search .(GTS), boosts productivity by reducing the number of person-hours involved in searching, sorting, and reading large volumes of documents. Source: <http://www.in-sourced.com/article/articleview/1493/1/1/> AFCEA Intelligence Symposium 2004 <http://www.afcea.org/spring2004/exhibits.asp> --- Telecommunications and Spying practices Spiegel Online of October 24, 2002 article by Frank Patalong Mr. Patalong of Spiegel reported that soon after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, government authorities, especially in America, began to crack down on web sites having to do with Islam, Mujahdin and al Qaeda. This was done with such thoroughness that Islamic interest groups in the USA protested the closings of harmless sites. Some sites, however, seemed to have escaped the dragnet. That includes Kavkaz, the primary news source for the Chechen Mujahdin. The site's been in operation for two years. The site lists Mavladi Adogov, the "Information Minister of the Chechen exile government," as contact, but it may be operated by Movladi Udug. (...) After Chicago, the flow of data to Kavkaz is routed by Cogent Communication, headquartered in Washington, and which hosts the Kavkaz pages. Cogent financial supporters include the Metacarta and In-Q-Tel companies. Metacarta is headquartered in Boston, same as the NSA's New England Electronic Crimes Task Force, and specializes in "fingering" (identifying) users and documents. The US intelligence agents have customized the Metacarta software a little. They use the technology to track movements of individuals. It was relatively easy to find where the other money for Metacarta came from. In-Q-Tel lists on its home page that it is a private, not-for-profit corporations "financed by the CIA." --- Kavkaz.org Based in the USA (terrorism in the United States) <http://english.pravda.ru/world/2002/10/25/38640.html> Even those who know nothing about web sites have probably heard about the kavkaz.org site. In short, this is the official web site of Chechen separatists, a stronghold of terrorism on the Internet. In the light of the universal struggle with terrorism, it is quite natural to suppose that all civilized people in the world would want the terrorist site to be closed. However, it still exists. And this happens at the time when the police in the USA and Great Britain track visitors of the kiddie porno sites down and put them in jail. Specialists can identify the home address of these people using the IP-address only. A simple Internet investigation allows one to determine the domain host, the IP-addresses of the server supporting the site, and the name and address of the provider where the server is located. This takes just several minutes. whois kavkaz.org Domain Name: KAVKAZ.ORG Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: Name Server: ATRIVO.BASSINTER.COM Name Server: ATRIVO2.BASSINTER.COM Updated Date: 23-feb-2002 Registrant: Udug, Movladi (KAVKAZ14-DOM) 10 Bird Lane Orlando, FL 32860 US Domain Name: KAVKAZ.ORG Administrative Contact, Technical Contact: Udug, Movladi (ZWWPQJQEGI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Udug,Movladi 10 Bird Lane Orlando, FL 32860 US +1-9745572730 123 123 1234 The address and telephone number of the domain host are also available. However, more interesting things are the following. The server address on the Internet is 66.28.38.232 whois -a 66.28.38.232 OrgName: Cogent Communications OrgID: COGC NetRange: 66.28.0.0 - 66.28.255.255 CIDR: 66.28.0.0/16 NetName: COGENT-NB-0000 TechHandle: ZC108-ARIN TechName: Cogent Communications TechPhone: +1-877-875-4311 TechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the company Cogent Communications, and where is it located? whois -a COGC OrgName: Cogent Communications OrgID: COGC Address: 1015 31st Street, NW Washington DC 20007 Country: US Our investigation revealed that an American company with the legal address in the US capital provides the service for terrorists. It would take five minutes to close the server down. However, despite numerous requests from Internet users and Russian state structures asking for the server to be closed, nothing is done. >From now on, before taking the USA-s statements on its struggle against terrorism >into consideration, remember please who breaks the laws on international terrorism >and provides hosting for this terrorist site. More on Kavkaz: [DOMAIN whois information on KAVKAZCENTER.COM ] Registry: VeriSign, Inc. - http://www.verisign-grs.com Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net Name Server[whois+dns with ip] NS1.KAVKAZCHAT.COM 66.28.63.241 Name Server[whois+dns with ip] NS2.KAVKAZCHAT.COM 66.28.63.242 Status: ACTIVE Updated Date: 20-apr-2003 Creation Date: 16-jun-2002 Expiration Date: 16-jun-2008 [whois.opensrs.net] Registrant: Kavkaz Istanbul, Bahcesehir D8/4 Istanbul, Turkey 34900 TR Domain name: KAVKAZCENTER.COM Administrative Contact: Tutuyev, Visami [EMAIL PROTECTED] Istanbul, Bahcesehir D8/4 Istanbul, Turkey 34900 TR +905552141304 Technical Contact: Tutuyev, Visami [EMAIL PROTECTED] Istanbul, Bahcesehir D8/4 Istanbul, Turkey 34900 TR +905552141304 Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC. Record last updated on 01-Mar-2004. Record expires on 16-Jun-2008. Record created on 16-Jun-2002. Domain servers in listed order: NS1.KAVKAZCHAT.COM 66.28.63.241 NS2.KAVKAZCHAT.COM 66.28.63.242 Ironic? Kavkaz and a company tied to the NSA, and spooks sharing not only the same subnet, but the same IP address. 66.28.63.241. Maybe someone just wanted to show a bit of gratitude here. "Nobody will get out of here alive, and they will die along with us if any attempt is made to storm the building," Barayev was quoted as saying by the Chechen Web site Kavkaz-Centre." (source NewsMax <http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/24/162841.shtml>) # whois -h whois.arin.net 66.28.63.241 OrgName: Cogent Communications OrgID: COGC Address: 1015 31st Street, NW City: Washington StateProv: DC PostalCode: 20007 Country: US ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.cogentco.com:4321/ NetRange: 66.28.0.0 - 66.28.255.255 CIDR: 66.28.0.0/16 NetName: COGENT-NB-0000 NetHandle: NET-66-28-0-0-1 Parent: NET-66-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: AUTH1.DNS.COGENTCO.COM NameServer: AUTH2.DNS.COGENTCO.COM Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE Comment: Reassignment information for this block can be found at Comment: rwhois.cogentco.com 4321 RegDate: 2000-10-12 Updated: 2001-12-05 TechHandle: ZC108-ARIN TechName: Cogent Communications TechPhone: +1-877-875-4311 TechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OrgAbuseHandle: COGEN-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Cogent Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-877-875-4311 OrgAbuseEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OrgNOCHandle: ZC108-ARIN OrgNOCName: Cogent Communications OrgNOCPhone: +1-877-875-4311 OrgNOCEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OrgTechHandle: IPALL-ARIN OrgTechName: IP Allocation OrgTechPhone: +1-877-875-4311 OrgTechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] So who else is interested in Social Networks? Big Brother sure is: --- SECRECY NEWS from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Volume 2004, Issue No. 15 February 9, 2004 * SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND INTELLIGENCE * BUSH NAMES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTELLIGENCE * IG: DOJ DID NOT VIOLATE FOIA BY WITHHOLDING DIVERSITY REPORT * LEAHY ON PARADE MAGAZINE ON FOIA * EISENHOWER: THIS LETTER WILL CONSTITUTE YOUR AUTHORITY SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND INTELLIGENCE read more at Federation of American Scientists <http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2004/02/020904.html> Social Network Analysis for Combating Terrorists Networks International terrorist networks have transformed the problems of homeland defense and international security by the development of novel tactics facilitated by flexible, adaptive cell-based organizational networks. Their use of novel tactics targeting civilians in the U.S. and abroad makes understanding and predicting their capabilities, targets, and estimating their available resources especially critical. Defense planners lack sufficient tools for understanding the dynamics of these networks, for exposing their vulnerabilities, and thwarting their activities holistically and effectively. Defense planners require a comprehensive understanding of these networks in order to create effective strategies to control and contain their activities. However, reliable and sufficient information about these networks is difficult to come by, often containing missing or erroneous data. Models and analysis tools are required for understanding the flows of expertise, funds, information, goods and materials. In addition, models and analytical tools are required to understand the command and control architectures of terrorist organizations and to develop effective strategies for the containment and disruption of terrorist activities. Office of Naval Research <https://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/personnel/342/hp_terrorist.asp> --- LinkedIn Washingtonians using the system include a slew of techies, including CEOs MichaelTessler of BroadSoft in Gaithersburg, Donna Hemmert of Dulles-based OptiView and Eric J. Kuhn of Varsity Group in Washington. Also linking in are many local venture capitalists and investors, such as John May of New Vantage Group, Tim Meyers of Updata Capital, John Backus of Draper Atlantic and quite a few people from In-Q-Tel, the Central Intelligence Agency's venture capital arm. Many America Online executives are checking it out, too, as are some politicos like former Clinton White House staffers Michael Nelson and Mike McCurry (although McCurry's profile notes he's not receiving requests for contacts). Such networking systems -- including Ryze.com, Itsnotwhatyouknow.com and Tribe.net (which is funded by The Washington Post Co.), and more socially oriented Friendster.com -- seem to be multiplying as fast as the connections themselves, especially among Californians. (Networking Without the Wine and Cheese <http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A18526-2004Jan14¬Found=true>) Washington Post This invitation was sent to Sil on behalf of K*** **** . If you do not wish to receive emails from orkut, click on the link below: http://www.orkut.com/Unsubscribe.aspx?id=******* You can also contact us at: 2711 Centerville Road, Wilmington, DE 19808. I wonder which government agencies are located at that address? Why not take a look at the few dozen <http://www.google.com/unclesam?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=%222711+Centerville+Road%22&btnG=Google+Search> sil [at] infiltrated [dot] net --- Additional links: * <http://cisar.org/usa/021024.htm> * <http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/inqtel> * New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/01/technology/01patt.html?ei=5062&en=d5adfdaa6578e9ff&ex=1070946000&partner=GOOGLE&pagewanted=print&position=> * <http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/social/index.html> * <http://archive.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/fushman/medinfo/ddf-medinfo04.pdf> * Google covets your email address <http://www.google-watch.org/email.html> (via Google Watch) * Google and the National Security Agency <http://www.google-watch.org/jobad.html> Social Network Analysis of the 9-11 Terrorist Network <http://www.orgnet.com/hijackers.html> * Propagation of Trust and Distrust (PDF) <http://tap.stanford.edu/trust04.pdf> * Developing a Taxonomy of Intelligence Analysis Variables via CIA website <http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/vol47no3/article05.html> * Google mail gets Big Brother stamp <http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1081334426703&call_pageid=968332188492> --- Thanks to Marcelo de Oliveira Santos. - c.a.t. iis.com.br/~cat/ �timo dia pra voc�. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goldenlist/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
