In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Jonathan E. Paton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This revives an old idea I had during the Santa tournament
>> where a genetic algorithm is used to evolve potential hole
>> solutions. The way it works is to initially create a large
>> number of random solutions, and let them evolve by mating
>> and mutating their way towards a legal solution. It would
>> be extremely interesting to see how the same evolutionary
>> process that led to the development of the human brain can
>> fare against our resident Aliens :)
>> 
>> Anyone interested in taking that idea to the next step?
> 
> Dave and co, 
> 
> Make sure that the TPR golf rules state that using automated
> tools to evolve solutions is prohibited.  Perhaps this is a
> "fair means" clause.  I'd hate to think that lazy sods could
> use:
> 
> tiger_pgolf.pl [1]
> 

I've in fact used tools to generate code fragments and evaluate them during
golfs (though it never really helped). I also think that's perfectly valid.
If anyone ever makes tiger.pl, more power to them I say.

And you would also stop Andrew's picture solutions, which basically proves
that an anti-generator rule is unacceptable.

I've in fact thought on and off about a "trivial parts" optimizer. It's
probably doable, but pretty hard. Maybe use it as hole in the penultimate
"golf contest to end all golf contests".

Reply via email to