In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Phil Carmody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- "Karger, Amir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, I'm wondering if there's something about the mindset
>> required for Fungeing that's also required for Perl golfing, or if
>> it's just that in any large group of computer geeks, there will be
>> a few who like Befunge.
>
> I think there must be! I remember giving up on befunge when it tried
> to be too clever regarding topology (wrapping), but I think it was
> certainly great fun. One of my plans is to write a language that's a
> crossover between dc and befunge (being a mathematician I find myself
> using dc quite often)
>
While i'm interested in different ways of thinking in programming
(functional, logical, OO or things like type goes with value or variable)
I'm not very interested in languages that mainly try to be different.
So at least one golfer is of the type that doesn't care about befunge...
--
I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away
-- Xander
