On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:31:59AM -0400, Yanick wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:58:10AM -0700, Phil Carmody wrote:
> > Note - I think I should be sandtrapped presently as _none_ of my
> > solutions work with
> > 0 1
> > 1 2
> > 2 3
>
> Ah, the test case for which I have cursed the referees' name
> for one hundred and twenty-seven generations (inclusive). I was
> breathing on |3en's neck, I really was when, *bang*, they come
> up with this [censored] test case that punt back my score half
> a dozen strokes behind.
I hate to spoil your fun, but it was me coming up with that test case.
After that *|[]() test case broke my script, I thought it was time for
revenge and dreamt something up to ensure I would finish ahead of you :)
CU,
Sec (no really, it broke my script to, but I think I found a nice
workaround in my 108 char solution ;-)
--
The most successful method of programming is to begin a program as
simply as possible, test it, and then add to the program until it
performs the required job." -- PDP8 handbook, Pg 9-64
