"Pom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just subscribed to the list. Does anyone have a small problem with the
> tiebreaker score given by the test program? Mine is always off a few
points
> (the test program always gives a lower score than the referees). My last
> attempt gave me .45, but the referees give me .49? Just a minor annoyance,
> but anyway.
Yes, the tiebreaker's a little broken.
To be honest, I'm not quite sure whether the code used in PGAS or the test
script's broken. You'll have to ask Rick about that.
Steffen
--
@n=(544290696690,305106661574,116357),$b=16,@c=' ,JPacehklnorstu'=~
/./g;for$n(@n){map{$h=int$n/$b**$_;$n-=$b**$_*$h;$c[@c]=$h}c(0..9);
push@p,map{$c[$_]}@c[c($b..$#c)];$#c=$b-1}print@p;sub'c{reverse @_}
