One big difference is that in the minigolf, we dont submit solutions, just the score. in this way you dont need a ref to check solutions, and the person who holds the contest can also play.
we use the same testscript, so there you have some re-use of code. What we could use is a automated leaderboard with a submit function, and i will create one in the not too distant future, but since the fuctionality is quite different, i dont think it's any point in using the pgas. Terje K ----- Original Message ----- From: Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:31:46 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: minigolf Re: Terje Kristensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Re: > It's been over a week since the TPR04c ended now, so i think it's time for another minigolf. :) Re: > Re: > This time it's a joint effort by myself and Mtve. Re: > Re: > http://terje.dev.webon.net/golf/ Re: Re: Every time I see these mini-golfs come up I think what a crying shame Re: it is that they don't use the same beautiful system that the TPR golfs Re: use. Not only do they miss out on all the nice submission mechanism Re: and automated leaderboard features, but it means that we end up with a Re: myriad of completed mini-golfs scattered around the web rather than Re: all easily accessible in one place for convenient study. Re: Re: Code re-use (in the most literal sense) is good! Would it be a hard Re: task to open up the sourceforge system for more general use? Re: Re: -- _______________________________________________ Download the free Opera browser at http://www.opera.com/ Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/ Powered by Outblaze
