Actually that produces the same error message repeatedly. I think the original definition takes that into account.
A variation which generates many different error messages eventually (equally adhering to the letter if not the spirit): s p o i l e r perl -we '$a="a"; eval $a++ while 1' On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 11:47, Jed Davis wrote: > "McGlinchy, Alistair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Puzzle: Write a one-liner longer than (say) 3 bytes that can improve > > on 0.77 distinct warnings per byte of code. The program should be -c > > valid, output nothing without -w and sound the alarm as much as > > possible with -w. > > It follows the letter of the puzzle, but perhaps not the spirit: > > perl -we 'eval"x"while 1' -- Jasvir Nagra http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~jas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
