I've tried all three .setRestrictions, by the way, to no avail.

On Feb 24, 3:37 pm, CloudNine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, after about a week I've worked it out about 99%.
>
> *** SOURCE CODE ***http://www.paste-it.net/public/ia73538/
>
> http://www.holland.aero/example_final.jpg
>
> Probably not the most elegant or efficient solution behind the scenes
> but it's nice enough up-front.  It was the AJAX Search reference I
> really had to study to understand how the results came back.  I opted
> to pick them out bit by bit instead of using the entire .html. result
> since it gave me more control over the display design-wise and made it
> easier to insert the A, B, C, D characters.  Also, returning the
> entire .html. result wouldn't render some special HTML entities like
> &iacute; and &oacute; for whatever reason.  I knew about panTo hence
> the reference in the original post, but as it turns out anyway,
> evoking the openInfoWindow automatically pans to fit the info box
> anyway, so the desired effect was inherent.  However, doing it this
> way has sorta backed me into another problem...
>
> Right now my script seems to only display results that have
> addressLine information, therefore it doesn't show user generated
> results, nor approximate location results, which is fine with me.
> However, if the first four returns from the LocalSearch are user
> generated results and/or approximate location results, my script
> displays nothing for that category.
>
> Is there options to get LocalSearch to return only those results in
> the system with addressLine info?  i.e. the *red pin* results on a
> typical map.google.com search.
>
> - D
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google AJAX APIs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-AJAX-Search-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to