I think the docs about low level api is rather limited. Some examples would be nice.
On Sep 23, 4:33 pm, Clay Lenhart <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > We're having a similar discussion here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/th... > > Andy, > My view is that there is no productivity difference between the two. > > It might be good to show us what is difficult to do in the datastore > but easy in JDO. > > Cheers, > Clay > > On Sep 23, 11:02 am, datanucleus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > BigTable simply is not a relational db, so it is highly misleading to > > > fake a relational wrapper and to me it caused lots of pain. > > > Apart from the fact that JDO is not a "relational wrapper". The API > > and metadata are object-based; only a subset of metadata is specific > > to "mapped" datastores and this is marked clearly in the (DataNucleus) > > docs. > > > As ever, if you have some specific issue to raise why not define it - > > e.g something that can be done in the low level API that can't be done > > via a generic API. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
