I'm afraid that it is not possible. But if the purpose of your relationship is only to manage child class in a transactional way you don't need to keep them as a part of child relationship.
Simply use Key type and set 'parent' part of the "child' key being the same and you can manage them in the same transaction. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
