a.maza:

That's correct, I'm using HTTPSessionStore because of the filesystem 
writing restriction. However, I'm interested in the implementation you 
are trying to do, so if you decide to share it with the community when 
it's done, I'll be happy to give it a try ;). Moreover, we have a 
fileupload gae-like implementation that uses the datastore instead of 
the file system to store temporary recently uploaded files (shared by a 
developer in the wicket users list), so I'd be interested in merging our 
code and your code into some wicket-gae.jar extension, so everything its 
located at one place and can be reused by others.

For the record, we haven't experienced any issues related to the 
back/foward button behavior (although I must tell that our app is still 
a small one and maybe that has something to do with it).

Regards,

Esteban

a.maza escribió:
>
> On 21 Okt., 20:26, Esteban Masoero <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Hi there:
>>
>> We've been running a wicket app on gae since last month, but without the
>> need of implement memcache-based implementation of Wicket's IPageStore.
>> Why are you doing that? (our wicket version is 1.3.7)
>>     
>
> Wicket is very powerful in maintaining application/session state. This
> enables for example a nice usage of back/forward buttons. In a typical
> scenario, this is backed by the DiskPageStore implementation. On GAE
> you can't use the DiskPageStore since it relies on writing to the
> filesystem. Thus, I assume that you use the HTTPSessionStore as
> proposed in some blog entries (and not the SecondLevelCacheStore).
>
> I did some research on the web and several users reported problems
> using the HTTPSessionStore - especially regarding the back/forward
> button behavior. Thus, I am currently trying to implement a Memcache-
> backed IPagestore for GAE. On the Wicket mailinglist I was provided
> with a HTTP session based implementation of IPageStore (done in the
> Terracotta project) to have a starting point (http://www.nabble.com/
> Google-App-Engine-and-Wicket-to23001592.html)
> >
>
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to