We know use it for 2 month and are finally completely stuck. This means bye-bye appengine and realizing our losses.
The Google Web Toolkit is also not called the Google Java Web Toolkit. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/overview.html does not give a peep about a whitelist! They should directly in the paragrah enter a box and write in red: attention, there is a whitelist of usable classes! Be aware of this! Whenever I heard Java before we knew that we dealt with a certain standard. There should be zero mention of the word 'Java' anywhere if it isn't a real Java! What does it mean if they use the Java6 JVM? The Java6 JVM allows multithreading and other things are missing - so not even the JVM claim is true. But the JVM has little to do with the standard 'Java'. What according to Sun deserves the name 'Java'? Answer: Sun is attempting to impose before providing Harmony with Java Compatibility Kit (JCK) technology necessary to demonstrate full Java functionality. Source: http://www.itpro.co.uk/109790/apache-sun-in-java-licensing-clash Does Google Appengine Java pass the JCK? No effing way! So don't call it Java! Call it jAppengine oder AppengineJ. In the end all they support is Java syntax and a couple of classes. On Nov 27, 8:13 pm, Nicolas Melendez <[email protected]> wrote: > i agree. should be called different. > call it gJava, googleJava or whatever. > > bye, > NM > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Diana Cruise <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I'm curious which classes you are referring to that are missing and > > are NOT considered a stability risk running under a shared app server > > environment. We are developing in Java with this solution so I don't > > mind the naming...I have yet to need a class not offered, guess I have > > been lucky :) > > > So, what would you recommend calling it? > > > On Nov 27, 12:04 pm, jago <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > this is not Java! The whitelist is ridiculous: > >http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/jrewhitelist.html > > > > There is so much missing I don't even know where to start. Is there an > > > issue I can star that extends the whitelist to the full Java6 lib? > > > > This is destroying the Java standard and shouldn't be called Java. > > > Every other company that tries to do an implementation of Java and > > > call it Java gets a massive punch from Sun. Why is Google allowed to > > > use Java6 with a whitelist and still call it Java? > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
