Suppose someone writes an app in C and wishes to cross compile to Java. In that scenario, if some C class is unsupported by the cross- compiler, then does the C app stop being a C app? No.
Bobby On Dec 1, 4:10 am, Bobby <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe for terminology's sake it would make sense to detach the GAE > from any language associations and just indicate that there are cross- > compilers from Java/Python to GAE. Then there would be no question on > whether it's "technically Java" - one does write in Java, it's just > that the cross-compiler has its own requirements and limitations. Is > that any better? :) > > Bobby > > On Nov 30, 2:58 pm, Nicolas Melendez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > if we are going to collaborate each other, we need the right names because > > communication is critical. > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jess Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There are innovators who "attempt" to advance the field and be the first. > > > They appeal to the desperate and the early adopters with nothing to loose > > > and much to gain. > > > > There are guardians with deep experience who strive to ensure reliability > > > and predictability. They appeal to those upon whom many are dependent; > > > those with everything to lose and little to gain. > > > > Both camps are invaluable. > > > > Incorrectly categorizing a technology, or failing to understand who you're > > > employed to represent, are personal problems. > > > > On Nov 30, 2009 12:22 PM, "Jeff Schnitzer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I, for one, am sick and tired of Sun's domineering, suffocating > > > stranglehold on what is and isn't Java. GAE is a breath of fresh air. > > > > JavaME and JavaEE also impose a variety of limitations on Java. > > > What's the difference between those and GAE? The difference is that > > > Sun got a committee of big company representatives with their own > > > vested interests in a closed room and argued about how "the official > > > specs" should work for years... and ultimately produced a bunch of > > > crap that is barely useful to anyone. Just *try* out Websphere > > > sometime, I dare you. > > > > For the first time ever, someone has produced a shared application > > > service model for Java that's even easier than PHP. This could never > > > have come out of the JCP. > > > > If this is "destroying java", then GOOD RIDDANCE! > > > > Jeff > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Google App Engine fo... > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
