Thanks for the advice, I'll try that.

On Mar 1, 2:31 pm, Rusty Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> Try using the old way with xml configuration for wiring your beans together.  
> The word on the street is that Spring's component scanning takes a lot of 
> time.
>
>
>
> luijar wrote:
> > Nope, I am still seeing it. It's quite frustrating. I even tried to
> > reduce Spring init time by removing schema validation from the
> > application context init. But, that does not seem to work. I am using
> > Spring annotations and component scanning to autowire my beans, I
> > wonder if using plain XML configuration will make autowiring faster.
>
> > On Feb 23, 9:14 pm, charming30 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Has the above mentioned "offline precompilatio" in 1.3.1 been able to
> >> solve your issue, I plan to use Spring on Java for my Business App
> >> which is complex and could be based on SOA. Kindly let me know if your
> >> issue was resolved or reduced by using the above fix.
>
> >> On Feb 20, 12:05 am, luijar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> I believe my development environment was on 1.3.0. That might be
> >>> something to look at, although it seems that probably it's a very
> >>> small overhead, do you have any metrics that would give some evidence
> >>> as to how much overhead is "offline precompilation" adding?
> >>> Thanks
> >>> On Feb 18, 2:04 pm, Don Schwarz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Have you deployed your application with the 1.3.1 SDK?  That release 
> >>>> turned
> >>>> on "offline precompilation" by default, which is an optimization that may
> >>>> help.
> >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Alex <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> It appeared that long init problem is well known for Grails users:
> >>>>>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1736
> >>>>> I wasted couple of weeks to create app I cannot run. Hope that
> >>>>> SpringSource and Google can solve the issue.
> >>>>> On Feb 17, 7:41 pm, Stephan Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> The problem is that the initialization of your app takes longer than 30
> >>>>>> seconds.
> >>>>>> Pinging your app doesn't help when the app is restarted due to
> >>>>> redeployment
> >>>>>> or maintenance, or when high traffic demands a second instance.
> >>>>>> You should try to reduce your startup time.
> >>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>> Stephan
> >>>>>> 2010/2/17 luijar <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> Great, all of our projects areSpringenabled lol. But I guess it's
> >>>>>>> good that we are not the only ones seeing this, hopefully it gets a
> >>>>>>> little more visibility. We have a cron job (1 min) that tries to keep
> >>>>>>> our application alive by hitting a URL, but it does not do a very good
> >>>>>>> job. It's frustrating and we don't even have access to the 500 page to
> >>>>>>> tell the user to retry or go somewhere else.
> >>>>>>> On Feb 17, 11:21 am, oth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Yes we have seen this problem a lot. Per our tests, an application
> >>>>>>>> becomes idle after a minute of non activity. So, the unfortunate
> >>>>>>>> reality is that you need to keep your app alive by simulating
> >>>>> activity
> >>>>>>>> on it. Or go the nonSpringroute.
> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 4:14 pm, luijar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hello Google App Engine forum,
> >>>>>>>>>   We have been seeing ever since we deployed our applications
> >>>>>>>>> (currently 3 of them) that when our application instances become
> >>>>> idle
> >>>>>>>>> (they have not been hit for x amount of seconds) subsequent
> >>>>> requests
> >>>>>>>>> return with a 500 response. Logs show a hard deadline exceeded
> >>>>> error
> >>>>>>>>> com.google.apphosting.runtime.HardDeadlineExceededError: This
> >>>>> request
> >>>>>>>>> (32306ebe63b71ab0) started at 2010/02/12 20:39:11.984 UTC and was
> >>>>>>>>> still executing at 2010/02/12 20:39:41.225 UTC.
> >>>>>>>>>         at
> >>>>> com.google.appengine.runtime.Request.process-32306ebe63b71ab0(Request.java)
> >>>>>>>>> And the first line of the log message has the following :
> >>>>>>>>> 02-12 12:39PM 14.088
> >>>>>>>>> javax.servlet.ServletContext log: InitializingSpringroot
> >>>>>>>>> WebApplicationContext
> >>>>>>>>> Question:
> >>>>>>>>> Has anyone else seen this behavior? How long does it take for an
> >>>>>>>>> application instance to become idle?
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>> Groups
> >>>>>>> "Google App Engine forJava" group.
> >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >>>>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>>> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%2B
> >>>>>>>  [email protected]>
> >>>>> <google-appengine-java%[email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> Groups
> >>>>> "Google App Engine forJava" group.
> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%2B
> >>>>>  [email protected]>
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
> --
> 0x2B | ~0x2b  --  Hamlet

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to