As a followup, today (3/17) from 1-3PM PST I received several
instances of "Request
was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your request." This
is on my app w/ zero users, just 3 requests/minute of a blank page as a test
load.


On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Don Schwarz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can you respond privately with your app id?
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:10 AM, James <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I setup some pings of my add a few minutes ago, and I'm still seeing
>> recycling :(
>>
>> My ping setup can't go lower than 60s intervals, so I have two running
>> concurrently.  Here's a sample of 20 log entries over 10 minutes,
>> with .  Three recyclings occur, and they happen less than 10s after a
>> previous request.  Really Google, you're killing my JVM after TEN
>> SECONDS?  And I get to pay you for the ton of CPU each startup uses?
>> Sounds like the more recycling, the more profitable the App Engine
>> becomes.
>>
>>
>> -
>> * 03-11 08:02AM 38.506 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 2158ms 2235cpu_ms 0kb
>> Site 24 X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 08:02AM 23.144 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 53ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 08:01AM 06.134 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 75ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 08:00AM 51.707 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 49ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 08:00AM 05.823 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 49ms 58cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:59AM 51.499 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 56ms 38cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:59AM 05.584 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 47ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:58AM 51.274 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 61ms 38cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:58AM 05.371 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 64ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:57AM 51.025 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 74ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>> * 03-11 07:56AM 57.327 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 7835ms 2119cpu_ms 0kb
>> Site 24 X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:56AM 50.784 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 75ms 58cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:55AM 57.008 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 50ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>> * 03-11 07:55AM 46.384 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 4250ms 2060cpu_ms 0kb
>> Site 24 X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:54AM 56.782 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 70ms 38cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:54AM 46.157 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 54ms 38cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:53AM 56.586 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 52ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:53AM 45.934 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 51ms 38cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:52AM 56.240 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 62ms 38cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>>  03-11 07:52AM 45.718 /?Pragma=no-cache 200 57ms 19cpu_ms 0kb Site 24
>> X 7 RPT-HTTPClient/0.3-3E,gzip(gfe)
>> -
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 11:02 pm, Alyxandor <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > If you are experiencing failed requests on your long-running /
>> > requests, consider performing some kind of "pre-warming" procedure of
>> > your own...  If you are getting timeout errors, Ping a do-nothing url,
>> > and wait for it to return before running the big job.  If it's a big
>> > job, users should expect to wait anyway {and you should tell them they
>> > are waiting!}, so the ping ensures {almost} that a warm JVM is running
>> > in the server nearest said users, and then the big /request can
>> > {usually} avoid getting killed with extra spin up time.  Very unlucky
>> > users would get a /ping on an old JVM, and /request a new one, but...
>> > Technology isn't perfect...  YET!
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-appengine-java%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to