Hello,

I agree with what was said before and I think essentially all these
frameworks are somehow similar. You should pick what fits best in your
application.

Personally I also went for Objectify because it is so well documented.
Actually by using it I started to understand the tricky parts of the
datastore. The only thing I really regret is all the time I lost
trying to make JDO work.

Cheers,
Toby

On Jun 17, 9:13 am, David Sowerby <david.sowe...@virgin.net> wrote:
> This is a difficult question to give a fair answer to - most of us
> only have time to make a fairly quick assessment then just decide to
> go with something - which means we only know one of them in any depth.
>
> I looked at Twig and Objectify, tried Twig briefly then elected to use
> Objectify - but that was because I preferred the approach of Objectify
> for my application, and my way of working and not because I felt there
> was anything wrong with Twig.  I cannot comment on Slim3, I have not
> tried it.
>
> Simon's suggestion above to look at some of the debate threads is
> still valid I think - it is probably the philosophy which drive your
> choice.  For me it was a case of keeping things simple and transparent
> in case I run into performance issues.
>
>  I can say that the Objectify documentation is excellent, and the
> responses to questions fast and equally good.  Twig's documentation
> was not as thorough when I looked at it but that may have changed, and
> I do not know what the forum responses are like.
>
> On Jun 16, 7:28 pm, Houston startup coder <stephenh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm liking Slim3 so far.  It has a fast wrapper for the low-level API
> > that does not use reflection (meaning it's even faster than frameworks
> > that do).  Plus it has some basic web framework helpers as well.
>
> > Stephen
>
> > On Jun 16, 12:34 am, nicolas melendez <nfmelen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > +1 Objectify
>
> > > But give a chance to twig too
>
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Dan Billings <debil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 Objectify
>
> > > > On Jun 15, 11:25 am, Simon <qila...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > There's a big thread athttp://
> > > > groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/th...
> > > > > where the authors of the two frameworks discuss the respective
> > > > > benefits of their frameworks, for different scenarios.  It's probably
> > > > > worth having a read, although it's getting a bit old now.
>
> > > > > Personally I've found Objectify very good - very thorough
> > > > > documentation and it works for me :)
>
> > > > > On Jun 15, 9:51 am, Marcel Overdijk <marceloverd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > What would you recommend: Objectify or Twig?
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups
> > > > "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine-java%2B
> > > >  unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > Nicolás Meléndez
> > > Java Software Developer
>
> > > 1) Google App Engine works:
>
> > > 1.a)http://www.clasificad.com.ar (Local free classifieds for  housing,
> > > sale, services, local community, curses,jobs, and events - GAE/J + Wicket 
> > > +
> > > YUI)
>
> > > 1.b)http://www.chessk.com (Massive multiplayer chess online  GAE/J +
> > > Applets + Wicket)
>
> > > 2) Linkedin:http://ar.linkedin.com/in/nicolasmelendez

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

Reply via email to