Yes it needs to be “serializable”. Thanks for your answer. pdias On 19 Jul, 09:30, Hariharan Anantharaman <[email protected]> wrote: > As long as the objects are serializable, I believe we can store them in > jcache. > > ~hari > > On Jul 19, 2010 9:15 AM, "pdias" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is possible to save object instances using JCache? > > I have tried and received the following message: > javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: > can't accept class CLASSNAME as a memcache entity > > Thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine for Java" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-appengine-java%2B > [email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
