Thanks for sharing this, Adam. I have been experimenting myself with a patched dojango (submitted the patch on their issuetracker) to get around the 1000 files limit.
One possible performance problem with the zipfile approach is that the files are served dynamically form the python application instance. Pure static files (I assume, haven't done measurements yet, nor know any details about Google's server setup) are provided by static file servers. regards Roberto On Sep 18, 3:53 am, "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Adam! This is really helpful. Even though you can use both AOL and > Google to load Dojo cross-domain, there are scenarios where you really want > to serve everything yourself. > > Cheers, > PS > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just wrote a post on how to serve Dojo and Django using zip files. > > The 1.1.3 release makes this a possibility for Dojo's static files in > > particular, although you still have to break Dojo up into multiple zip > > files to get around the limit on file sizes. I also give brief tips > > on adapting Guido's Rietveld scripts and settings to your own project. > > > I thought some folks here might find it useful. > > >http://tinyurl.com/5xxs88 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
