OK but it means creating an array of callbacks. It would be easier to have one callback with a context parameter IMO. Furthermore, integration with GWT and its JavaScript "overlay type" is easier with the "context" parameter.
Just my 2cents. Jean-Lou. On Nov 2, 5:28 am, "Malte Ubl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > you can provide a callback parameter that may include [] so you can > write something like this callback=jsonpCall[13] > > Bye, > > Malte > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 2:01 AM,Jean-LouDupont > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just a suggestion: you could add a "context" parameter for > > applications where multiple dispatch is required. > >Jean-Lou. > > > On Oct 31, 3:00 pm, "Malte Ubl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey, > > >> I've just released a very simple application that can be used to turn > >> any JSON webservice into a JSONP webservice. > >> It takes an url parameter, fetches that url, validates the json and > >> then returns it wrapped in a callback function. > > >> Is this ok with the terms of service? Do you think the problems with > >> respect to security are too serious to leave this online? > >> An example is > >> here:http://jsonpgateway.appspot.com/?url=http%3A//search.yahooapis.com/Im... > > >> Bye > >> Malte --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
