if you need features of django > 0.96 then it makes sense to use this patch (or writing your own ...)
if not, I agree with gops regards On Jan 3, 2:43 pm, gops <[email protected]> wrote: > dont use it if you are in learning phase , or not in hurry. > > think this way :: if there was a need of app engine patch than google > would have released it. > > and i personally think , webapp is sufficient for pretty large > project , afterall no matter how much django do for you , atlast for > sufficiently large project we endup > with our own library-or-framework. > > On Jan 2, 10:42 pm, Ray Malone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure of the benefits of using the Patch. I have been able to > > build two good sized apps (1000+ lines of code each) using the App > > Engine defaults. I know my code is not best practice yet, so I'm > > looking to learn more and make my next app better. While I like how > > the models are setup, the process of creating and maintaining an app > > seems complicated. Can you tell me what I would gain from using the > > Patch. Thanks > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
