Thanks for the report, I'm working on getting this fixed! -Marzia
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:57 AM, gops <[email protected]> wrote: > > the think i like about google is , you respect it so much that , even > if it make mistake , you just point that out the best way you can. > > had it been that microsoft made such mistake , i dont think much > people will bother to even tell them ....... > > :D > > On Dec 31 2008, 1:15 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is big enough to be posted in the issue tracker, > > but I noticed a small coding mistake when I was reading the Datastore > > Modeling article athttp:// > code.google.com/appengine/articles/modeling.html > > > > Right at the bottom of the "One to Many" section, is the following > > paragraph followed by a line of code: > > > > "When Scott loses his phone, it's easy enough to delete that record. > > Just delete the PhoneNumber instance and it can no longer be queried > > for:" > > > > jack.phone_numbers.filter('phone_type =', 'home').get().delete() > > > > Shouldn't the line of code be: > > > > scott.phone_numbers.filter('phone_type =', 'home').get().delete() > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
