We have no such plans to announce at this time. Feel free to make and star an issue for it. -- Dan
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Onestone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dan, are there any plans to eventually support client-side BOSH > (a.k.a. HTTP-binding for XMPP)? Server-side XMPP support is not very > useful, but client-side BOSH support would be great. > > On Feb 9, 7:56 pm, Dan Sanderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > XMPP support will not take the form of long running processes. XMPP > > connections will be maintained by servers that relay incoming messages to > > the app's XMPP handlers, each of which will execute just like an HTTP > > request handler. There will also be an API for sending XMPP messages > from > > the app, among other things. > > -- Dan > > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Roberto Saccon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Uuhh, typo, I mean XMPP, see > > >http://code.google.com/intl/und/appengine/docs/roadmap.html > > > > > On Feb 7, 12:20 pm, Roberto Saccon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Now we know it, XMMP comes to appengine. So far, appengine has been > > > > limited to shortlived-HTTP requests. What are the educated guesses > > > > (or somebody who knows it, is allowed to speak out loud here ...), > > > > will XMMP bring streaming HTTP request with possibly longer lifetime > > > > than 10 sec to appengine (but also higher cost, like HTTPS), so we > can > > > > do long-polling or other serverpush hacks ? Or none of this, it will > > > > run on the same platform and just normal polling will be > > > > "encouraged" ? > > > > > > Roberto > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
