S3 only hosts static files, so it's not going to do you much good for hosting the site itself. App Engine with S3 for file storage is probably a viable option.
On Mar 1, 1:02 pm, Akshar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi There- > > If I am planning to host an application around images then should I > choose app engine or not? > > I know image size limitation is around 1 MB for app engine so assuming > this limitation is not an issue which service would be better, app > engine or s3. > > Please comment on pricing aspect also in case the usage becomes 100 K > daily actives ;o) > > Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
