That's why issue 1174 requests the fastest possible json, not cjson. 1174 actually requests multiple jsons, so folks can use what's best for their application.
On Mar 23, 10:32 pm, Joseph Turian <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the author of the blog post. > > <b>Update (20090324):</b> According to <a href="http:// > kbyanc.blogspot.com/2007/07/python-serializer-benchmarks.html" > rel="nofollow">Extra Cheese</a>, cjson 1.0.5 has an incompatibility > with simplejson in processing slashes. A fix is available from <a > href="http://www.vazor.com/cjson.html"; rel="nofollow">Matt > Billenstein</a>. However, Dan Pascu, the author of cjson, deprecates > Matt Billenstein's cjson 1.0.6 because Matt's patch parses the JSON > twice, which makes it twice as slow. This will still be faster than > all alternatives in certain circumstances. You will not find Matt's > cjson on the cheeseshop, only on Matt's site. > > On Mar 23, 10:55 am, Andy Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > According > > tohttp://blog.metaoptimize.com/2009/03/22/fast-deserialization-in-python/ > > , simplejson is significantly slower than cjson. > > > I've created an issue requesting the fastest possible json > > athttp://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1174.- Hide > > quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
