Are these benchmarks each for a single put/get/delete with 100 entities, or for 100 separate puts/gets/deletes with 1 entity each?
-Nick Johnson On Apr 15, 4:06 pm, 风笑雪 <[email protected]> wrote: > I can give you some result of db operation using Python. > I did this test last week, but I can't find my code now... > > Someone can give a Java benchmark? > > result unit: second > > add 100 entities: > > 1.07751011848 > 1.78107213974 > 0.826889038086 > 2.46827101707 > 0.966767072678 > > fetch 100 entities: > > 0.0892021656036 > 0.108892917633 > 0.105209112167 > 0.0894641876221 > 0.1026699543 > > update 100 entities: > > 0.893841028214 > 0.999007940292 > 1.11865115166 > 1.06479501724 > 0.981703996658 > > delete 100 entities: > > 0.81419301033 > 0.84040594101 > 0.949120998383 > 0.903990030289 > 0.863884925842 > > 2009/4/15 Sylvain <[email protected]> > > > > > We need a benchmark :) > > > On 15 avr, 16:32, 风笑雪 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think right now, Python is more powerful and easier than Java in > > GAE.You > > > need much less configuration and code to do a same thing in Python. > > > > In my opinion, Python will save you 60% to 80% time of coding, but runs 5 > > to > > > 10 times slower than Java. > > > However, about 80% time is cost in db operation, and there won't be much > > > difference their performance. (I haven't test it yet.) > > > > 2009/4/15 lok <[email protected]> > > > > > As my corp only use .net and Java > > > > My SA told me to study what is the difference between Java and Python > > > > in terms of their functionality and performance . > > > > Is that everything can be done by Python can also be done by java in > > > > Google App ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
