I'm curious...did this latest release address the crippled full-text
search issue?


On Aug 10, 8:13 pm, johnP <[email protected]> wrote:
> To clarify -
>
> The datastore_cache recipe *did* stop working.  It seems that the only
> call that's getting passed-through to the wrapped stub is CreateRPC -
> this is a newly-introduced method - and the recipe does not have a
> method handle this call.
>
> How to make it work is several levels beyond my level of
> comprehension:)  If anyone has some pointers as to how to make it
> work, I (and many developers) will be thankful:)  This is such a super-
> valuable recipe...
>
> Also - is there a way to make it more future-proof?
>
> Thanks!
>
> johnP
>
> http://appengine-cookbook.appspot.com/recipe/seamless-memcache-cachin...
>
> On Aug 7, 1:21 pm, johnP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Were there any changes on the production server that would cause the
> > datastore_cache recipe to stop working?
>
> >http://appengine-cookbook.appspot.com/recipe/seamless-memcache-cachin...
>
> > johnP
>
> > On Aug 7, 1:14 pm, Alkis Evlogimenos ('Αλκης Ευλογημένος)
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:00 PM, nebulabug <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Can somebody explain more no
>
> > > > # Composite indexes no longer required for certain types of key
> > > > queries.
>
> > > Example queries:
>
> > > db.MyModel.all().ancestor()
>
> > > This doesn't need an ancestor index anymore since ancestors are stored in
> > > the key.
>
> > > db.MyModel.all().ancestor().filter('__key__ >', ...)
>
> > > Likewise.
>
> > > > # Enhancement to SearchableModel allowing multiple properties to be
> > > > indexed.
>
> > > > On Aug 7, 6:49 am, johntray <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I'm with you. 1.2.4 is a big disappointment.
>
> > > > > On Aug 6, 9:38 pm, Emilien Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Is it just me or does it seem that this new release adds
> > > > > > functionalities that don't seem to be on the list of that many 
> > > > > > people?
>
> > > > > > The 3 issues that are linked to fromhttp://
> > > > code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkReleaseNotes
> > > > > > for release 1.2.4 were starred by respectively 2,1, and a whopping 5
> > > > > > persons! Making the assumption that these are all different people,
> > > > > > that means that 8 persons have directly asked for these
> > > > > > improvements...
>
> > > > > > I'm not criticizing the release, just questioning the priorities...
> > > > > > It's nice to somewhat improve the queries and the Remote API, but
> > > > > > aren't there other features that seem to be much more urgent? What
> > > > > > happened to the important points of the Roadmap to be done around 
> > > > > > June
> > > > > > 2009, if I remember well?
> > > >http://code.google.com/intl/fr/appengine/docs/roadmap.html
> > > > > > Quite a lot of the things on this page seem to be much more urgent
> > > > > > than what's just been released...
>
> > > > > > Or maybe am I just asking too much???
>
> > > --
>
> > > Alkis
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to