Hi, On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:07 AM, jpmorganuk <john.paul.morgan.uk@ googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I find it frustrating that > > * there is no OR clause in GQL. I work around this by creating > seperate queries and appending the results in memory. If there is a > Sort Order on the concatonated results then more CPU time is extended > – and there is a CPU time limit of 10 seconds which is often is blown. > An 'or' clause in GQL would need to be implemented in exactly the same fashion as you describe here. > > * I cannot filter on the same field twice. Meaning I cannot set up a > construct of Field A = “1″ AND (Field B > “1″ AND Field B < "2") AND > (Field C > MyMinValue AND Field C > MyMinValue). I need to create > workarounds for this too. > You can filter on the same field multiple times, but you cannot have inequality filters on multiple fields. -Nick Johnson > > Are there any plans to add support to GQL for these types of > constructs? > > Thanks > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > > -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
