Maybe (a big maybe) if Google introduces some other lighter language (like PHP(?)), we could stand a chance.
But now (the Java GAE version is what I am playing with), GAE seem so massively oversubscribed that it makes the worst web hosting industry's oversellers to look like paradise. I would expect *major* pricing increase in order to bring Java support up to a manageable level and decent performance. A $5 monthly fee (as proposed on the tracker) in order to keep a JVM is not going to happen - I don't think that this is technically possible, due to Java runtime constraints. A $30 as an absolute minimum would not surprise me at all. After all, not all of us need super scaling capabilities - which are also missing as you correctly state in your post). On Jan 12, 11:18 pm, Locke <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't cloud computing unless they let our apps scale with our > bank accounts. But still, I'll stick with Google in hopes that their > hosting is ready for the prime-time before my app is ready for the > prime-time.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
