Go for it! What's great about App Engine and capacity is that we'll grow with you. It's unlikely you get the same amount of traffic all hours of the day, so you only pay for 4000 QPS the hours during the day you're hitting that - the rest of the time, we'll spin down unused instances.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, peterk <[email protected]> wrote: > That's good enough for me :) > > Now off to build my 4000 qps monster ;) > > Cheers, > > On Feb 16, 7:18 pm, ryan > <[email protected]<ryanb%[email protected]>> > wrote: > > On Feb 16, 4:58 am, peterk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > But what if your app needed this capacity on a more persistent/ > > > permanent basis - would this be OK too? Are there apps doing this > > > already? > > > > > I'm presuming yes...but it would be nice to maybe hear it more > > > explicitly :) > > > > "yes." :P > > > > as i mentioned, the obama open for questions traffic graph was one of > > the smaller ones. we have many apps with steady state traffic far > > above 500 qps, and we've seen apps serve traffic spikes of over an > > order of magnitude higher. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine http://googleappengine.blogspot.com | http://twitter.com/app_engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
