I'm using Python. And only Python's standard library that's in GAE. My guess is that the cold start problem is similar in the Java version.
The cold start time has improved but now and then loading the index page takes frustratingly long time. That's poor quality for both end users and developers. On Feb 20, 7:21 pm, Brandon Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you using python or java? what is your framework? > > On Feb 20, 1:26 am, Anders <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This has been discussed before but the problem still remains. It seems > > that GAE is no longer in a preview release version (as far as I can > > see). Having a cold start initiation time of 10 seconds is a major > > bottleneck. > > > Imagine if it took 10 seconds to load for example the Google Search > > index page in your browser. It doesn't sound like a very long time, > > but today that kind of load time for an index page is very poor > > performance. > > > I understand that GAE cannot at the moment hold all applications hot/ > > warm, because that would require a lot more resources I assume. But I > > think the cold start time needs to be brought down to a maximum of > > around 2 seconds. > > > It actually doesn't matter in many cases if an application is used by > > millions of users every day or only seldom by a few people. The load > > time for webpages is usually extremely important regardless the amount > > of traffic to a website. Each user's experience counts. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
