I as not referring to sole fact that he needs to retrieve 2000 rows, obviously. Nor I was suggesting/expecting to recompile anything. But Adrian has said that his application is write-heavy. Considering people from Google say that AppEngine approach is rather optimized for reads than for writes I think somewhere it *might* become an obstacle too big...?
2010/5/10 Jaroslav Záruba <[email protected]> > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:15 PM, djidjadji <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think retrieving 1000 or 2000 objects/rows from an SQL >> database is considerably faster then the distributed approach of >> Bigtable. >> The main problem of the question was that the time for a retrieve >> request was taking too long. One way of solving this is chopping it in >> pieces and do it in parallel, just like MapReduce. >> >> I'm not telling that every app can be implemented on AppEngine, but >> many can if you drop the RDBMS way of doing. AppEngine is not a >> platform of "just recompile". You need to rewrite. >> > > Not that anyone would suggest otherwise, right? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
