I only showed a part of my "model", there might be other "root" nodes
so I just grouped accounts logically (in my mind at least). I think
the key here is the title of my post - I am utterly confused about
Entity Groups and the Class Hierarchy of the Data Model.

On May 17, 1:29 pm, Jaroslav Záruba <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Disclaimer: I don't have the ambition to clear this up to you. :)
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:16 PM, rvjcallanan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > A logical class hierarchy would look something like this:
>
> Accounts
>
> > -->Users
> > ---->Years
> > ------>UserDataSchema
>
> > Yet, according to GAE documentation, this is one big humongous Entity
> > Group (with Accounts at the root) which would fall over on itself as
> > local copies are maintained and transaction isolation is enforced.
>
> Is there a reason why you can't have each Account as a root entity? (Instead
> of having one "bhEG". :)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to