It makes me feel like the the regular App Engine will become a kind of sandbox for developpers to play with before going with the business edition.
I hope I'm wrong with that point of view. François On 19 mai, 22:43, Houston startup coder <[email protected]> wrote: > SSL was the single most important feature to me on the roadmap that > existed prior to this new App Engine for Business announcement. Now > I'm a bit concerned because I don't see it at all on the roadmap for > regular App Engine applications. Unless I can easily use App Engine > for Business for public app users without having to authenticate them > against Google Apps, I really really need SSL for the regular App > Engine solution! > > Stephen > > On May 19, 2:41 pm, johnP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I agree that it's an uncomfortable position seeing that key features > > such as SLA and SSL are being denied regular Appengine users. For > > those businesses that believed that regular Appengine is intended to > > become an enterprise-level platform, it is worrisome to see such > > artificial segmentation being worked into the mix. > > > I hope it's just a big misunderstanding. > > > johnP > > > On May 19, 11:15 am, peterk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's a distinct lack of details that makes me not sure if I should > > > be excited or not :| > > > > I had figured things like custom-domain SSL, perhaps even a SLA or > > > premium support would get added to the existing offering, even if at > > > cost. > > > > The key question will be what increase in cost there'll be to migrate > > > a regular appengine app to Appengine for Business, to get these > > > features. Google's left a question mark over billing for 'external' > > > public apps under App Engine for Business. > > > > On May 19, 7:13 pm, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >http://code.google.com/appengine/business/ > > > > > Thank you Google App Engine Team! > > > > Very good too see that you are listening to the feedback...and > > > > addressing them with this thoroughly impressive response! > > > > > /Chris > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Google App Engine" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]. > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google App Engine" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
