Hi Ikae

We couldn't leave the production environment in place with the broken
urls.
So have already deployed a version with args on the end of all css/js
urls.

I don't believe it was an ISP issue.  We tried accessing the site
from 5 different ISP's in Australia when we first discovered the
problem.

Maybe you behind googles infrastructure can't see the issue. More than
a few people have posted
links exhibiting the problem in the list (and they aren't in
Australia).

We have a full test instance in gae as well but we haven't been
mapping it do a domain to date.
As we have never experienced this issue before. (Site went live mid
last year www.polytechnic.wa.edu.au)

Rgds

T

On Jun 4, 1:49 am, "Ikai L (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tim, can you provide 2 URLs that are doing this?
>
> I'm still trying to reproduce the problem. Could an ISP be caching these
> files?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Tim Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > Not to bad an idea.
>
> > At the moment all of our templates use '/css/some_file.css'
> > rather than including hosts.  So we don't need to make changes between
> > code bases
> > or have to lookup what the host should be, (in light of the issue we
> > may well have to change that strategy)
>
> > For the moment we  just add ?<some value> to the end of the css/js
> > files that are changing, and will probably set up a script to be run
> > prior to appcfg, to increment
> > these values.  All the css/js is referenced in just a couple of main
> > templates (zpt)
>
> > Rgds
>
> > T
>
> > On Jun 3, 10:17 pm, J <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Tim, what we ended up doing was a bit different. We have qa.abc.com
> > > pointing to xyz-qa.appspot.com.
>
> > > We did not change file names as was recommended -- that would be a
> > > pain in the rear to manage. But we took advantage of the fact that xyz-
> > > qa.appspot.com delivers content correctly. We changed references to /
> > > scripts/pqr.js tohttp://xyz-qa/appspot.com/scripts/pqr.js.
>
> > > It was faster to put in place and it buys us some time until we can
> > > come up with something better.
>
> > > Hope that helps.
>
> > > On Jun 2, 7:44 pm, Tim Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi
>
> > > > I have raised an issue for this
>
> > > >http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3297
>
> > > > Rgds
>
> > > > T
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-appengine%2Bunsubscrib 
> > [email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> --
> Ikai Lan
> Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
> Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
> Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
> Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to