Okay, thanks! Just what I wanted to hear. I guess my benchmark results were due to randomness then.
/Blixt On Jul 20, 3:00 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Blixt, > > Since a query consists of an index scan followed by a batch get, internally, > the batch get alone should always be faster. One possible exception is if > you're doing a query that is satisfiable by the primary index - for example, > querying on a key range, or only by kind with no filters. In these cases, > performance is likely to be about the same, possibly slightly better for the > query. > > -Nick Johnson > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Blixt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd like to know the performance difference between db.get()ting with > > specific keys and getting the same entities using a filter. > > > I did a benchmark and using a query appears to be very slightly > > faster. Are there situations where the performance can differ more? > > Are there other pitfalls I should watch out for? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-appengine%2Bunsubscrib > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine Google Ireland Ltd. :: > Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: > 368047 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
