That's yet another 'proof' for me that Objectify should replace JDO in GAE, officially! :P
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Dmitriy T. <[email protected]> wrote: > The author of this article just underqualified. > > For example: > "So I took to writing the service in Python. I quickly realized that > Python had much more control over the datastore. It was really easy to > pick which fields to index and which fields to ignore. In Java, all > fields were indexed." > > He even don't know how to make unindexed property in Java. About Java > GAE low-level API or about Objectify he probably know nothing. > > > On Sep 10, 1:19 am, Francois Masurel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've just found this article about App Engine : > > > > http://moderndeveloper.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-app-engine-scaling... > > > > They say that Python is 50% faster than Java for their specific use > > case. > > > > Does that mean that we should preferably use Python for heavy traffic > > services ? > > > > Francois > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
