The @login_required decorator works only for GET , It is mentioned in
that page.
So i am using  the first method u suggested

Thanks a lot for the help .


On Jan 18, 11:25 am, Robert Kluin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, if you need to be able to allow some requests without cookies to
> a 'secure' url you'll need to use a lower-level solution like those.
> The options in app.yaml are higher-level.
>
> Robert
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 00:17, Silencer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Robert ,
>
> > Those solutions look better coding to me.
>
> > So i will have to anyway remove login:admin for URL's destined to be
> > used for Cross Domain Resource Sharing.
>
> > Even login:required will also fail right ?
> > Because preflight request is never send with cookies.
>
> > So basically i have to implement url securing myself.
>
> > On Jan 17, 11:19 pm, Robert Kluin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Securing your URLs in code is OK, provided you're doing it
> >> consistently perhaps using a decorator, or in a base AdminHandler.
> >> This will let you allow some calls or respond differently to non-admin
> >> calls.
>
> >> You might also want to check out the users.is_current_user_admin() 
> >> function.
> >>    http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/users/functions.html
>
> >> And, I would also suggest looking at the @login_required decorator.
> >> You could just write a @admin_required decorator.
> >>    http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/webapp/utilmodule....
>
> >> Robert
>
> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:33, Silencer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > i have two apps let us call it app1 and app2 ;
>
> >> > Assume that i have logged in as admin in both apps.
> >> > in my work-flow i have to do a POST request from app1 rendered page
> >> > (http://app1.appspot.com/sourcepage )
> >> > to and apps url (http://app2.appspot.com/updatedata) .
>
> >> >http://app2.appspot.com/updatedataisa url secured by login:admin in
> >> > the app.yaml file
>
> >> > Now in FF3.6 , when such an ajax request is done using jQuery ,
> >> > FF3.6 will first send a Preflighted request ( OPTIONS request ) .
> >> > This request is sent without cookies.
> >> > So appengine returns a redirect as response.
> >> > Although i have implemented the options(self) function for the
> >> > request, the control never reaches there
>
> >> > So the original POST is not send at all.
>
> >> > i read in some article that the credentials will not be sent with the
> >> > Preflighted request
> >> > So in that case is there a way to make options request alone to pass
> >> > through for admin urls ?
>
> >> > TO get my workflow done at last i removed login:admin from app.yaml
> >> > and
> >> > checks for user logged in and compare email id's to a set of allowed
> >> > admins.
> >> > I know it is  bad programming , but still.
>
> >> > Is there any thing that i miss ?
>
> >> > Please help
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups "Google App Engine" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > [email protected].
> >> > For more options, visit this group 
> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to