On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, always-on is pretty important for low-traffic apps. They usually > do not use free quota and quite often they are not even close. Having > to pay for always-on + app fee + instance hours would be huge > difference. And all of that just to make smooth start for new > requests... > Thanks for the thoughts on this, it is a really good point and one we think is important which is part of the reason it is taking us longer to determine the best approach for this. BTW, good to see Google App being expanded. It's great to have service > like that - it really takes away most of that stuff that is not actual > development :) > Glad to hear! That's our goal :) Thanks again! Greg > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
