I wonder how this is going to work with super heavy things like django. Previously having an idle instance around for a while was not a big deal. Now with a more agressive scheduler it might be interesting.
Glad I use light frameworks and have superlow startup times. On May 11, 2011 5:27 PM, "Gregory D'alesandre" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Nitu Chiring <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am currently having Always on feature. so does that mean I shall end up >> paying 3 * 24 * 30*0.05 $s? > > > Hi Nitu, we are still finalizing the detail on how Always on will work and > will announce that information when we have it. > > >> Also my application uses email heavily to notify users. >> And the free quota been just reduced to 100 recipients . >> > > This is true, although existing apps will continue to get 2000 > recipients/day only newly created apps will be 100 recipients per day. > > Hope that helps! > > Greg > >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
