Eww, GAE would have to increase their prices 1000x before Azure could even begin to look mildly attractive.
On Jun 1, 4:36 pm, "Brandon Wirtz" <[email protected]> wrote: > We have been porting our app to ASP.net for Azure. For small requests the > overhead for ASP is big, and for Big requests it is small. There is > certainly Risk/Rewards to weigh in dev vs hosting costs. > > -Brandon > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Tuppeny > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Price comparison between GAE, EC2 & > Azure > > LOL! > > In my experience, ASP.NET MVC is not slow, and any performance benefit will > be outweight by the speed of development - I'm far more used to writing C# > in Visual Studio than writing (and debugging) Python :-) > > On 1 June 2011 20:53, Brandon Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote: > > See if you are writing in asp.net your app will be way slower, totally off > setting the cost savings. GAE is cheaper because by forcing you to use an > efficient language your app will cost fewer CPU cycles :-) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
