(David Walt = me) Thanks Stephen, it seems to be a good idea. But unfortunately, even if openID is a great idea at the beginning, time has shown than users are completely lost with openID, and it would explain why this concept didn't have the success that it really deserves.
Whatever, I'll take a deeper look to this solution. Because finally, if users can suscribe without beeing confused, that's the only thing which matters for me. I guess I could even not telling them than they are creating an openID when they're suscribing? Thank you very much. On 4 juil, 06:08, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:29 PM, David Walt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > I would like to create a website, using "UsersAPI", because as you > > all know, it provides lots of help to handle log in/out, security, > > etc. Reinvent the wheel would be stupid I guess. > > > But, and this is huge BUT, you are forced to use Google account (or > > OpendID). > > Use openid, but be your own openid provider. Now you get to control > the sign-up experience but reuse Google's auth cookie and user api. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
