Ditto - although the figure I'm looking at is moving from well within the existing free quotas to $120/month - for a non-revenue-generating application.
I suppose you could argue that as the service has been running for a couple of years, Google have already donated what they now value to be $2880 dollars of resource, but looking at the actual resources consumed, it is difficult to see how it has cost them that much. Will still put the effort in to see how efficient things can be made in light of the new scheme, but would have appreciated maybe a couple of months rather than a couple of weeks to do so. I suspect I'll end up spending $9 a month for a paid app that simply serves redirects to the app re-hosted on AWS until enough clients update bookmarks, and then remove billing and let it whither on the vine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/0I2ObFcAQjoJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
