Hey Greg,
  There are a number of reasons I won't use back ends for this.   I thought
I'd submitted an issue for this months ago, but maybe I just talked with you
guys about it. I'll try to double check and submit one if needed tomorrow.

Robert

On Sep 2, 2011 2:38 AM, "Gregory D&apos;alesandre" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Robert, I'm certain you already considered this but would it be
possible to use backends for the processing tasks?  This sort of situation
is why we are looking into putting settings on Versions but it hasn't come
up that often which is why it isn't a higher priority.  I can't find an
external issue for it, but feel free to create one and star it and to start
to get more feedback.
>
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Robert Kluin <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> Here is one use case for per version settings:  I always want my user
requests served very fast, so I want ow latency / willingness to spin up
instances for the default version.  However, I also do a lot of processing
in tasks, but it does not need to spin up instances aggressively.  Too bad I
can't upload a dedicated version to run the tasks then tweak the settings.
>>
>> I'm in this exact situation with a couple apps right now.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2011 2:23 AM, "Gregory D&apos;alesandre" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> >
>> > Maybe I misunderstood the question, but I'm not sure how instance
settings for versions impacts this.  Are you currently running both an app
for paid users and an app for unpaid users from the same App?  Is there a
reason you can't run it as 2 Apps?  While Versions can serve live traffic
they were designed to be Versions of a single App and not multiple Apps
which is why we don't have the same settings on non-default versions.
>> >
>> > If you go into a bit more detail about what the issue is there might be
other ways to solve the problem.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Greg
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Angke Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yet you charge us heavily before all those functions are present. Now
>> >> I can't treat my own paid/unpaid users separately. Everyone of my
>> >> users will suffer from a degrade of service because I can't afford so
>> >> many instances.
>> >>
>> >> Good job Google.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Gregory D'alesandre <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> >> > Yes, we are planning on on doing instance settings for versions at
some
>> >> > point, although we don't have a date to announce as to when that
will be.
>> >> > Thanks for the question!
>> >> >
>> >> > Greg
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:28 PM, pdknsk <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've put mail sending on a separate named version, to have separate
>> >> >> logs and graphs. It works very well, thanks to the task target
>> >> >> parameter. However, mails are send in huge batches, and spin up
>> >> >> instances which sometimes stay idle for hours. It might help to
adjust
>> >> >> idle instances and latency, but this will affect the default
version
>> >> >> as well then.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I know this probably isn't using versions as intended, but still.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
>> >> >> "Google App Engine" group.
>> >> >> To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> >> [email protected].
>> >> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
>> >> > "Google App Engine" group.
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> > [email protected].
>> >> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google App Engine" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to