I may have to check if I'm in a beta/non-public thing. I enjoy some special privileges and may have something others don't.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pascal Voitot Dev Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 1:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Azure is changing its prices too really java? I thought it was just .net/php interesting to know! On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Brandon Wirtz <[email protected]> wrote: Azure isn't .Net only. I run Java on it. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pascal Voitot Dev Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 12:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Azure is changing its prices too the main problem is .NET, isn't it? :D I can't consider a proprietary dev platform to be the right solution even if I know it's good on many aspects and brought many interesting ideas! On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Philip <[email protected]> wrote: MSFT has an interesting approach that is IMHO an opposite to exploiting their market power. They deliver their technology to partners like eBay, Dell and HP so they can offer the same cloud service (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/appliance/) in theory you could easily switch from one to another without redesigning your app. There are also .NET ports for linux that are AFAIK even supported with code by MSFT. Also MSFT had to pay an insane fine for bundling internet explorer with windows. I doubt they risk another record fine by raising prices for their technology at a intolerable rate (>100%). eBay, Dell and HP are companies you don't fu** with. On Sep 2, 9:12 am, Anders <[email protected]> wrote: > Azure looks pretty cool. But isn't .NET like a monopoly? I would like an > open source cloud platform. That would really make the prices go down. > Because new cloud providers would basically mostly have to provide the > hardware infrastructure since the software for the cloud services would be > open source and free. Not limited to PHP though. Yikes, lol. I would want > the open source to also run Java applications. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:google-appengine%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:google-appengine%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
