I marked it as WorksAsIntented because it was involving "Always On" (which is going to be replace by Min-Idle-Instance in the new pricing model).
I asked you to fill a new issue with your more recent testing with only Dynamic instances that I'm willing to escalate. Thanks in advance. On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Francois Masurel <[email protected]> wrote: > Google just changed the issue 5414 status to "WorkAsIntended", so I guess we > are missing something. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/IXIhUhSeP5sJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- Johan Euphrosine (proppy) Developer Programs Engineer Google Developer Relations -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
